
Shishapangma is the highest peak entirely in Chinese territory, yet, strangely, it is the nearest eight-thousand to Kathmandu, the capital of Nepal, and the only one visible from the town itself. It was the last of the fourteen to be climbed, a result of travel restrictions imposed in Tibet during the ‘fifties’. On the first ascent in 1964, ten Chinese climbers led by Hsu Ching reached the summit by the North- West Face and North Ridge. This may seem a large summit team, until you consider that there were 206 expedition members in all, including scientists and base camp staff! Doors were not opened to non- Chinese parties until 1980 but in that year and 1981 another five ascents were completed, all of them following more or less the original route. it remains a popular expedition, with a high success rate, up what is probably the easiest eight- thousand. The Tibetan name Shishapangma translates as ‘the range (Shisha) above the grassy plain’, which is exactly how it looks when approached from the north. Part of this peak’s attraction is its accessibility: it is possible to drive with jeeps and Lorries to base camp at 5000m and from there yaks can be used to ferry loads right up to 5800m. Cho Oyu, a few hours’ drive south of Tingri, is similarly convenient and for this reason many expeditions to Tibet choose to climb both of these mountains in the same season. Once acclimatized on Cho-Oyu, it is not unknown to spend less than a week on Shishapangma and still manage an ascent.
The South Face is steep and not quite so accessible, though by most peaks’ standards the approach is short and kind. Traveling from Friendship Bridge on the Nepalese frontier, Nyalam is the first settlement on the Tibetan plateau that one reaches after a five – hour drive. It is from this dreary, dusty village, reminiscent of Spaghetti Westerns, that one starts the three- day walk up the Nyanang Phu Chu. The valley leads to a grassy base camp site at the far end of a boulder- strewn plateau above the north bank of the Nyanang Phu Glacier and directly opposite Pemthang Karpo Ri (6830m), one of the fine peaks on the Nepalese frontier. One advantage of climbing on this side of the mountain is that, instead of driving straight to 5000m, one starts walking in from around 3800m with a better chance to acclimatize. This was the approach followed on the sixth ascent of Shishapangma in 1982. The party organized by Nick Prescott was the first to climb the mountain in pure alpine- style, tackling a face which had only before been glimpsed from across the frontier, in Langtang. Before setting foot on Shishapangma the three lead climbers, Doug Scott, Alex MacIntyre and Roger Baxter-Jones, made the first ascent over three days of Pungpa Ri, 7,445m by its south-west couloirs ridge (45degree ice and grade IV), cannily acclimatizing and getting a close look at their projected descent route from Shishapangma. That was in mid-May. Then on the 28th after three bivouacs on the south Face, they reached the summit of Shihapangma. Their route takes a fairly direct line to reach broad snowy couloirs which emerges just east of the summit. For the most part on snow and ice, there is one section of quite hard mixed (Scottish 4) to reach the base of the final “Peapod”. Although the overall angle of the face is not as steep as the team had expected, their route was quite sustained, with few obvious bivouac sites. Four twenty-eight year old MacIntyre, who died later that year descending the South Face of Annapurna this route and his book co-authored with Doug Scott, The Shishapangma Expedition, will serve as a fitting memorial. He was a brilliant alpinist with a sharp mind, whose ideas and inventiveness led and inspired others – a cult figure of modern alpinism.
MacIntyre, achieved some of his greatest climbs, such as the south Face of Changabang and the East Face of Dhaulagiri, with the equally single minded pole, Wojciech Kurtyka, and it was Kurtyka who eight years later pioneered another route on the south Face of Shishapangma. The line he completed with the Swiss pair Jean Troillet and Erhard Loretan takes a similar gully to the Peapod on the 1982 route but on the left (west) side of the Main Summit. Entirely on snow and ice never steeper than 55 degree, this route provides the shortest and quickest climb to the summit of any eight thousand. The line heads for the col between the west and Central summits, but it is best to break out right 200m beneath the col, taking a subsidiary couloirs direct to the Central summit. On the first ascent Loretan and Troillet, in characteristic fashion, climbed the face at night carrying no bivouac equipment and emerging on the summit ridge at dawn. Kurtyka also carried no equipment but was slower and decided to bivouac on the descent at 7800m. The night was ‘pleasantly warm’. ‘For a busy man or woman’, wrote Kurtyka, summing up the accessibility of this route, ‘it is dream ground to flash an 8000m peak.’ But, he added, does a busy man or woman have the necessary confidence and stamina for that kind of high- altitude exercise? The Polish/Swiss Shishapangma climb was completed just two weeks after the same trio had flashed their new route on Cho Oyu. There is a third, harder, line on this face, pioneered in 1989 by one of the giants of Himalayan climbing, Andrej Stremfelj, and his fellow Slovenian Pavle Kozjek. This route rated IV/V mixed and up the buttress between the two central gully lines and took three days on the first ascent. The easiest descent from Shishapangma is the normal route to the north. However, most people will want to return to southern base camp. Kurtyka, Loretan and Troillet reversed their route on the south face. Other parties have chosen the original British descent, coming down the South- East Ridge to the 7300m col between Shishapangma and Pungpa Ri. This ridge has some knife- edged sections and needs care. From the col there remains a long, tiring descent of huge 45degree snow/ice slopes, trending diagonally west to avoid big serac barriers. Shishapangma’s South Face is a fine, sporting alternative to the normal route from the north. The British route is an important landmark in Himalayan alpine- style history. The Swiss/Polish route is the easiest, whilst the Slovenian line offers perhaps the most technical and absorbing mountaineering adventure.
SUMMARY STATISTICS AND INFORMATION
Mountain:- Shishapangma
Height:- 8,046m
Location:- Langtang Himal, Tibet
Route:- South-Face. Three parallel lines, each with 2200m of ascent on a 50degree face. The 1990 route is on snow and ice throughout, whilst the 1982 and 1989 routes offer varying degrees of mixed ground.
First ascent of Mountain:- Summit reached 02 May 1964, by a Chinese party led by Hsu Ching.
First ascent of Route:- 25-28 May 1982 by Alex MacIntyre, Roger Baxter-Jones & Doug Scott (UK), 17-19 October 1989 by Pavle Kozjek & Andrj Stremfelj (Slov), 2 October 1990 by Wojciech Kurtyka (Pol), Jean Troillet & Erhard Loretan (Swiss).
Height of b/c:- 5600m, above the north bank of the Nyanang Phu Glacier opposite Pemthang Karpo Ri, 6830m.
Roadhead:- Nyalam, 3800m
Length of walk-in:- Approximately 20km, 2-3 days.
Season:- May or October, as in Nepal, appear to be the best months. In May the face will be drier and probably more prone to stone fall.
Permission:- China-Tibet Mountaineering Association, Lhasa (Tibet)
Success Rate:- Quite high
The Nangpa La is the key to an historic trading route still used illicitly today to bring wood from the Khumbu forests of Nepal to build houses on the3 barren plains of Tibet. Mountaineers driving south from Tingri toward this pass, en route to Cho Oyu or in more recent years the Rongshar Chu and the challenge of Menlungte (7181m), will be taken by the scale of this deep divide in the Himalaya. On its right is the unclimbed and beautiful Jobo Rap Sam (6666m), whilst to the left is Cho Aui (7350m), climbed by a Japanese expedition in 1986. Left again is Cho Oyu, the dominant feature of the language and the sixth highest peak in the world. This is surely one of the earth’s most beautiful places. More parties climb Cho Oyu from Tibet than Nepal. Access is much simpler, it being possible to drive to within a day of base camp though this may of course present its own acclimatization problems. Also 1982 border changes now mean that one’s passage on to the lower slopes of the classic North-west Ridge, line of the first ascent, is unreasonably difficult from the south (assuming that one doesn’t’ poach across the Nangpa La and then return south on the Gyabrag Glacier as Herbert Tichy and party did in 1954). Furthermore, many more routes have been opened on the Tibetan side of the peak, three of which are excellent technical climbs: the 2000m high north Face, climbed by a Slovenian team in 1988, the Polish west Ridge (1986), and the west Face. The west face first climbed in 1990 by that unstoppable team of Kurtyka, Troillet and Loretan, in just two days, including a descent of the north-west ridge is particularly attractive for the alpine climber. From the base of the face at about 6,200m a broad, 45degree couloir carries one high on to the face before a sustained section of mixed climbing (IV) on rock steps, punctuated by steep (60 degree) snowfields between 7000-7800m leads one to a ramp line running rightward to the unclimbed south west ridge at 8100m. The summit plateau is met very near to its highest point which may be a blessing, though it must still be crossed in order to reach the start of the descent of the original route. The Polish (west) Ridge that forms the left side of this face is easier, being mostly on steep snow and ice (up to 50 degree) though there is one 200m section of rock (III) to reach 7200m where it is possible to traverse on to the Tichy route. To stay on the ridge crest (the slopes of the original route hereabouts may be prone to avalanche in very snowy conditions) world mean joining this route higher up, nearer 7800m. Being relatively safe, it will be interesting to witness the popularity of the west Ridge in coming years. To date it has been repeated only once, in the winter of 1989 by Carlos Buhler (US) and Martin Zabaleta (Spa) who comment favorably on the quality of the climbing. At present, however, the original route is certainly the most popular. Herbert Ticht who led the first ascent was an exemplar of lightweight climbing and his story has a particular poignancy measured against modern trends of lightweight expedition. Philosopher and traveler first, mountaineer second, his aim was not solely to climb the peak, but to climb it specifically with a small team of friends. However, as the expedition progressed he became more and more consumed by the summit eventually risking the loss, at very least, of his already frostbitten fingers. ‘As nearly all religions strive to take away the fear of death and make it seem acceptable, I may claim to have had a genuine religious experience, he wrote. Others might simply call it anoxia and by most rational criteria his single-minded drive for the summit was foolhardy. However, as Diemberger once remarked, ‘everyone has the right once in his life to do something a little crazy.’ Tichy got away with it sustaining only minor permanent injuries to his fingers. He attributed his remarkable healing not to religion but to the copious quantities of Chang and Rakshi that he drank on the way home.
It is over forty years since the first ascent of Everest, the world’s highest mountain. Many, if pressed, world say that its summit is the one place they would most like to reach. Even those who scorn peak baggers cannot fail to understand its draw. So strong is it that some mountaineers are fully prepared to litter the mountain and its base camp sites with packaging, discarded tins of food, glass, ropes, oxygen cylinders and tents that will never decay only rip in the wind or lie frosted each year buried in snow and stripped again by winter winds. Such desecration and disregard for Everest was sadly inevitable. In order to conquer this peak man has felt moved to disarm it trussing it up in tens of kilometers of fixed rope. But many now consider such a siege style outdated and unacceptable. The emphasis among modern mountaineers, visiting peaks of any size, is not to reduce the mountain in this way but instead to raise them and climb it in a lightweight, environmentally sensitive manner. Everest has witnessed every phase of the development of Himalayan mountaineering. That is not remarkable, but the scale of the achievements is. Its history is known well enough seven determined efforts in the twenties and thirties reaching over 8,500m on the North ridge with minimum of technological aids the first proven ascent in 1953 from Nepal the stupendous traverse by Tom Hornbein and Willi Unsoeld ten years later, the ascent of the South-west face in 1975 the first ascent without oxygen assistance in 1978 by Peter Habeler and Reinhold Messner. Two years later Messner succeeded in making a solo ascent from the north in just three days showing that a rapid time was possible if one could catch the correct conditions. Messner chose a calm spell at the end of the monsoon when the mountain had a heavy snow cover which had consolidated just enough to allow rapid progress. He took the pre-war route to 7800m and then made a long tracerse across the North Face (below the level of the pre-war attempts) to gain the Great Couloirs and thence the final summit pyramid. Earlier in the year a Japanese party had forced a route (using extensive fixed rope) directly up the right hand side of the North face to link up with the Hornbein Couloirs. After the Messner ascent other climbs notably the 1984 Australian ascent of “White Limbo” – confirmed that by catching good snow conditions it was possible to reach the summit quickly and this point was powerfully confirmed by a rapid ascent of the Face in 1986 by two of the world’s greatest exponents of the art of extreme climbing in the Himalaya. This ascent more than any other in this book, and appropriately enough on the world’s highest peak, expresses alpine-style in its most natural and powerful form.